Imported Layers Created using Figma Group Created using Figma Shape Created using Figma Shape Created using Figma Imported Layers Created using Figma Shape Created using Figma Shape Created using Figma Imported Layers Created using Figma Path Created using Figma logo Created using Figma “ Created using Figma Group Created using Figma

Banks make a start on new capital

SP web 17 v2
Simon Pannett | Posted on Jul 18, 2019

A new capital security issued on Tuesday night by Westpac Banking Corporation (Westpac) has highlighted the lack of higher-yielding opportunities available for New Zealand-based investors.

Banks fund the loans they make from deposits, bonds and shareholders’ contributions.  In Australia, that’s also the order in which funds are repaid in the event of default.  To go into further detail, there’s also a class of securities that sit between shareholders’ funds and senior bonds; securities in this class are issued with various features under a range of names but, broadly speaking, they fall under the umbrella of ‘additional capital’.

Last week, the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) finalised an amended requirement that Australian banks raise an additional three percentage points of total capital. It is expected this increase will take the form of additional capital, or more specifically, Tier 2 capital, ie coupon-paying bonds that are subordinated to senior bonds.

The Reserve Bank of New Zealand’s (RBNZ) view of Tier 2 capital stands in stark contrast to APRA’s.  Firstly, APRA requires Tier 2 securities to include a clause, known as a non-viability trigger, which requires that the securities are written off or converted into equity if APRA deems it appropriate.  In order for New Zealand dollar securities to be consolidated onto the parent bank’s balance sheet and count towards group Tier 2 capital, APRA requires a non-viability trigger.  The RBNZ is sceptical of non-viability triggers for several reasons, including its view that non-viability triggers may not be able to be implemented in a timely or practical manner to be able to save a bank from failure. The RBNZ has prohibited these securities as components of the regulatory capital stack.  Therefore, any Tier 2 securities issued in NZ ultimately become very expensive funding when considered at a group level.  

Secondly, in its most recent capital review, the RBNZ has questioned the need for Tier 2 entirely given it helps protect creditors in the event of default when the RBNZ’s primary goal has been to avoid default. The upshot is that NZ banks are unwilling to issue Tier 2 securities.


Source: RBNZ, APRA

Three years ago, prior to the RBNZ’s determination, there was $4.7bn of additional capital securities outstanding in the NZ market.  As securities have matured and not been replaced, this value has dwindled to just $2.0bn[1]. That is making it difficult for kiwi investors to source higher-yielding investments.  Even though this void has created an opportunity for corporates to issue subordinated debt on terms attractive to them, very few have taken advantage of this excess demand. In the Harbour Income Fund, as a result, we have instead been seeking opportunities in Australia.

It is estimated that the current stock of Australian Tier 2 securities will increase from A$40bn to A$90bn. That’s probably too much for the Australian market to absorb alone and is likely the reason Westpac issued in USD last Tuesday night. There were questions whether the expected increase in supply would push spreads wider.  Judging by the reported ten times over-subscription for Westpac’s $1.5bn (two-maturity) deal, there remains plenty of appetite for this paper globally.  The 15-year security swaps back to New Zealand at a spread of 2.4%, while the 20-year security lands at 2.6%. 

While we retain a positive credit outlook on the Australian banks, this yield pick-up is yet to entice eligible Harbour Funds.

[1] $1.15bn of the maturities have been from foreign banks not impacted by the RBNZ’s ruling

Harbour Asset Management Limited is the issuer and manager of the Harbour Investment Funds. Investors must receive and should read carefully the Product Disclosure Statement, available at We are required to publish quarterly Fund updates showing returns and total fees during the previous year, also available at Harbour Asset Management Limited also manages wholesale unit trusts. To invest as a Wholesale Investor, investors must fit the criteria as set out in the Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013. This publication is provided in good faith for general information purposes only. Information has been prepared from sources believed to be reliable and accurate at the time of publication, but this is not guaranteed. Information, analysis or views contained herein reflect a judgement at the date of publication and are subject to change without notice. This is not intended to constitute advice to any person. To the extent that any such information, analysis, opinions or views constitutes advice, it does not consider any person’s particular financial situation or goals and, accordingly, does not constitute personalised advice under the Financial Advisers Act 2008. This does not constitute advice of a legal, accounting, tax or other nature to any persons. You should consult your tax adviser in order to understand the impact of investment decisions on your tax position. The price, value and income derived from investments may fluctuate and investors may get back less than originally invested. Where an investment is denominated in a foreign currency, changes in rates of exchange may have an adverse effect on the value, price or income of the investment. Actual performance will be affected by fund charges as well as the timing of an investor’s cash flows into or out of the Fund. Past performance is not indicative of future results, and no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made regarding future performance. Neither Harbour Asset Management Limited nor any other person guarantees repayment of any capital or any returns on capital invested in the investments. To the maximum extent permitted by law, no liability or responsibility is accepted for any loss or damage, direct or consequential, arising from or in connection with this or its contents.